The Biggest Scam in History?
“Climate Change” May be One of the Biggest Transfers of Wealth Ever
– Climate Change Alarmists create fear so they can manipulate the population
– The goal is the collapse of industrialized society
– IPCC members know there is no warming
– IPCC manipulates the data to prove their theory
– Weather forecasters can’t accurately predict next week’s weather so how can we believe computer models that claim to know what climate will be like decades from now?
– Modeling climate is impossible
– IPCC projections have all been wrong. We have cooling, not warming
– IPCC process is useless
– There are dangers and high costs to policies based on IPCC faulty science
Is it Joseph Goebbel’s “Big Lie” technique at work? You will remember Goebbel’s was Adolph Hitler’s Minister of Propaganda in the Nazi government of Germany in the thirties and during World War Two.
The Big Lie technique goes like this: Tell a big enough lie loudly enough and often enough and most people will believe it.
The Global Warming Alarmists seem to fit that bill. Here is the game (and ’twas ever thus):
Create fear and you can manipulate public opinion to whatever end you want.
It is how and why the controllers start wars. War is a huge transfer of money from taxpayers (people) to the arms manufacturers (the controllers).
Create fear about Global Warming and you can also transfer money from people (taxpayers) to the controllers who set themselves up to receive grants, subsidies and contracts to battle this illusion of Global Warming.
Goal: Collapse Industrialized Society.
“If you don’t learn the lessons of history, you are bound to repeat the mistakes of history.”
Maurice Strong, a Canadian who created the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (the IPCC), did so in order to collapse industrialized society. That appears to be the ultimate goal of the Climate Change Alarmists. Strong said this: “Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilization collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?”
He is quoted in Dr. Tim Ball’s book The Deliberate Corruption of Climate Science. Ball goes on to say: “How do you cause industrialized society to collapse? You cut off their energy supply. Fossil fuels drive the industrialized economies and CO2 is a byproduct. Show it is causing irreparable damage and you can demand alternative energy replacements.”
Ball points out that the IPCC, a United Nations organization, was created with the mandate to prove that Global Warming is caused by humans. Ball outlines how the IPCC members have used unscientific methods.
The scientific method, you will recall, is to prove something that other scientists can then replicate.
IPCC Members Know There is no Global Warming?
Ball contends that from the leaked emails, IPCC members knew and know that Global Warming does not exist and is not caused by humans. Their emails among themselves indicate they are fully aware but have conspired to create the fiction.
Ball: “CO2 is not causing warming of climate change. There is no scientific need to replace fossil fuels.” He goes on to say all the alternate sources are more expensive, quoting a US Senate report.
Peer Review Process Corrupted
Part of what distinguishes science is the vetting of scientists work by other scientists. A review by your peers. “Dr. Frederick Seitz…wrote in a reference to the 1995 report (The second IPCC report) ‘I have never before witnessed a more disturbing corruption of the peer-review process than the events that led to this IPCC report.'”
“Meanwhile the IPCC violated many scientific principles. As Green and Armstrong note:…’…We have been unable to identify any scientific forecasts of global warming. Claims that the earth will get warmer have no more credence than saying it will get colder.'”
They Can’t Predict Weather Accurately for the next Week, How Can They Forecast it For the Next Century?
Climate is not different from weather. It is just the average of weather. Don’t you and I already know how difficult it is to forecast the weather? How many times have you joked with your friends about how the weather forecasters got it wrong? And the IPCC wants us to believe they have a crystal ball that tells us where we will be in 50 years or more? Hmph.
The IPCC Models Themselves Don’t Agree With Each Other?
Ball: “The IPCC takes the average results of some 22 computers and average them to produce an ensemble result. As Robert Brown, physicist at Duke University notes: ‘First–and this is a point stunningly ignored– there are a lot of different models out there, all supposedly built on top of physics, and yet no two of them give anywhere near the same results!'”
“MIT meteorology professor and former IPCC member Richard Lindzen summarized the process: ‘It uses summaries to misrepresent what scientists say; uses language that means different things to scientists and laymen; exploits public ignorance over quantitative matters; exploits what scientists can agree on while ignoring disagreements to support the global warming agenda; and exaggerates scientific accuracy and certainty and the authority of undistinguished scientists.”
Global Warming is Worse Than Terrorism -Sir David King
Second President of the Czech Republic Vaclav Klaus in his book Blue Planet in Green Shackles, summarizes the problem:
“Future problems will not come from the same source. The ideology will be different. Its essence will nevertheless be identical: the attractive, pathetic, at first sight noble idea that transcends the individual in the name of the common good, and the enormous self-confidence on the side of its proponents about their right to sacrifice the man and his freedom in order to make this idea reality. What I have in mind was, of course, environmentalism and its present stronger version, climate alarmism.
There is no scientific justification for any energy or economic policies designed to reduce greenhouse gases or stop warming or climate change. CO2 from human or natural causes is not causing global warming or climate change. Beliefs that it is are solely the product of the IPCC and their computer models, an agency and approach set up to mislead the world. Yes, as Sir David King said: global warming is worse than terrorism.”
“The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.” -H. L. Mencken.
Does Global Warming Alarmism fit the bill?
Modeling Global Climate Impossible?
“The science is settled” is a phrase often used by the Alarmists. Well, first science is NEVER “settled.” Time after time, what we were told was true, turned out to be false. The sun circles the earth. The earth is flat. Science is uncovering new information all the time that reverses previous theories. So to say the “science is settled” is just silly. It appears to be a cynical tactic to shut down debate.
Ball: “I knew modeling global climate change was impossible; apart from the inadequate surface and upper atmosphere database, computer capacity was and is still inadequate. At conference after conference, I watched modelers bully everybody. Models are the most corrupt part of the CRU and IPCC fiasco, an exposure yet to emerge. They produced ridiculous ‘scenarios’ used to promote control through fear.”
“Wikipedia: The Missionary Wing of the Global Warming Movement.”
William Connolley of the CRU (Climate Research Unit) established himself as an editor at Wikipedia, according to Ball: “…he controlled all entries related to climate, climate change and the people involved. This included putting up false material about skeptics..”
Lawrence Solomon describes the activities: “All told, Connolley created or rewrote 5, 428 unique Wikipedia articles. His control over Wikipedia was greater still, however, through the role he obtained at Wikipedia as a website administrator, which allowed him to act with virtual impunity. When Connolley didn’t like the subject of a certain article, he removed it–more than 500 articles of various descriptions disappeared at his hand. When he disapproved of arguments others were making, he often had them barred–over 2,000 Wikipedia contributors who ran afoul of him found themselves blocked from making further contributions. Acolytes whose writing conformed to Connolley’s global warming views, in contrast, were rewarded with Wikipedia’s blessings. In these ways, Connolley turned Wikipedia into the missionary wing of the global warming movement.”
Name Calling Tactic: Call Skeptics “Deniers”
That lumps skeptics in the same boat at Holocaust Deniers.
IPCC Process “Useless”
Ball: “Some, such as Richard Lindzen, Alfred P Sloan professor of meteorology at MIT, participated–hoping to have reasonable scientific input but eventually gave up. There’s little doubt, Lindzen said, that the IPCC process has become politicized to the point of uselessness.”
“Every Single Climate Prediction (Projection) the IPCC Made Had Been Wrong” -Tim Ball
“Use of circular arguments is standard operating procedure for the IPCC. For example, they assume CO2 increase causes a temperature increase. They then create a model with that assumption and when the model output shows a temperature increase with a CO2 increase, they claim it proves their assumption.”
A Children’s Exercise
“…Richard Lindzen (said)..the 2001 IPCC Report ‘was very much a children’s exercise of what might possibly happen’ prepared by a ‘peculiar group’ with ‘no technical competence.’ Maybe, but it achieved their political objective of isolating and demonizing CO2.”
The Big Lie
“All this was inspired by the principle–which is quite true in itself–that in the big lie, there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily.” -Adolph Hitler, Mein Kampf
Dangers of the Global Warming Lie
Ball: “The sad truth is none of the energy and economic policies triggered by the demonization of CO2 were necessary. The price paid even to date is incalculable and it will go on costing for too many people, especially scientists and governments, who built their entire careers around the falsehoods…
Because they applied politics to science they perverted the scientific method by proving their hypothesis to predetermine the result. They bullied, marginalized, and silenced skeptics for a while, but natural events contradicted their predictions…There are two major dangers of what was done.
1. The credibility of science, especially climatology will suffer badly.
2. Environmental issues will suffer because people will say you lied to us before why should we believe you now.”
One of the ways the Alarmists dismiss Skeptics is to attack personalities, rather than the issues. They know they can’t win the debate on issues, so they focus on trying to find dirt on the messengers. Watch for that.
Dr. Tim Ball site: http://drtimball.com
Love, Laughter and Smiles
Matti Anttila, Certified Laughter Yoga Teacher. Zen of Joy Consultant and Author of: The Zen of Joy. How to Rewire Your Brain for Happiness & Success. http://zenofjoy.com/ (Free Zen of Joy Questionnaire)
“When we open to our potential, the world changes…dramatically and for the better.”
“Sitting is the New Smoking.” Special Report:
Yours with a no-cost Subscription to Mastery Newsletter
108 Tips for More Joy, Energy and Health, includes How to Feel Authentic Joy, Even When Unhappy (No-cost) http://joyenergyandhealth.com
Matti Anttila, Certified Laughter Yoga Teacher. Zen of Joy Consultant and Author of: The Zen of Joy. How to Rewire Your Brain for Happiness & Success.
How Joyous are You? Free Zen of Joy Questionnaire. Click here: http://zenofjoy.com
Publisher Matti Anttila © Copyright 2016 Matti Anttila, 304 – 1834C Oak Bay Avenue, Victoria, B.C. Canada V8R 0A4
Welcome to our new subscribers. Think of someone you know who is interested in health, wealth and/or freedom. Invite them to subscribe to Mastery Newsletter. Just ask them to go here: http://joyenergyandhealth.com/mastery-newsletter-sign-up-page/
Privacy statement: I take your privacy seriously and do not distribute your information to anyone.
Disclaimer: Please make your own decisions about everything. That includes investment, taxation, health and/or any other area. Seek professional assistance before attempting any of the ideas, tools and/or techniques discussed herein.
Any and all information provided here is not a substitute for the advice of a licensed medical practitioner. Individuals are advised not to self-medicate in the presence of significant illness. Always consult with your licensed medical practitioner first before undertaking anything…be it supplements, exercise programs or other protocols. The information on this website is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease. Do not construe the information provided here as authoritative health advice…or authoritative advice of any sort. All information provided or referred-to on this website is for informational purposes only. It is not intended to be health, medical, financial, accounting or tax advice, nor should it be relied upon as such. Matti Anttila is not a licensed financial planner, doctor or health practitioner. If you’re not inclined to Do-It-Yourself then please, before you Do-It-To-Yourself, obtain professional advice.
Trackback from your site.